My Photo

PRACDL Blog Contributors

  • Tom Lincoln
    PRACDL Board Member
  • Rachel Brill
    PRACDL Board Member
  • Jorge E. Vega-Pacheco
    PRACDL Board Member
  • Linda Backiel
    PRACDL President

Email

PRACDL Board

  • Linda Backiel
    President
  • Mariángela Tirado-Vales
    Vice President
  • Jason González-Delgado
    Secretary
  • Jorge E. Rivera-Ortíz
    Treasurer
  • Rachel Brill
    Board Member
  • Joseph C. Laws, Jr.
    Fed. Pub. Defender - Board Member
  • Thomas R. Lincoln
    Board Member
  • Olga M. Shepard de Mari
    Board Member
  • Jorge E. Vega-Pacheco
    Board Member

Past Presidents

  • Joseph C. Laws, Jr.
  • Jorge L. Arroyo Alejandro
  • María H. Sandoval Ochoa
  • Thomas R. Lincoln San Juan
  • Mariángela Tirado-Vales

PRACDL By Laws

Legal Guide for Bloggers


  • Bloggers' Rights at EFF

USLaw.com Blog Network


  • lawyer blogs

CC License

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 11/2004

May 07, 2005

Is this why we cannot have cellphones inside the courthouse?

Assistant U.S. Attorneys are allowed to have their cellphones inside the courtroom (under a court-created "law-enforcement duties" exception to the general ban), and I can only imagine that agents are allowed to do so as well. Up until now I always thought that it had something to do with one of two matters:

  • Court security
  • Judges either not wanting to hear a phone ring in the middle of a proceeding or in the lobby, or simply not wanting someone calling a radio station to have the court proceedings broadcast over the airwaves.

Well here is a new one I had not thought of. It appears that there was a rumor in some courthouse that someone from inside the courtroom was sending text messages (either using a blackberry or a cellphone) to a sequestered witness regarding testimony inside the courtroom. See Text Messaging and Trials: A Volatile Mix at law.com.

But what most caught my eye in that article was the following:

Most recently, wireless gadgets caught the ire of the Judicial Conference of the United States, which recently sent letters to chief judges in all federal courts warning them of the security risks associated with wireless technology. The Judicial Conference, which does not have a policy specifically on wireless communication, advised judges to adopt policies to regulate the use of such technology in the courts.

I do not know whether the District of Puerto Rico has adopted any such policy beyond the banning of all cellphones by attorneys (unless you happen to be an AUSA) and the public. That has been in effect for some time now, and I do not know when the communication from the Judicial Conference took place. It seems to me, however, that there should be no disticntion between Assistant U.S. Attorneys and other attorneys. The law enforcement rationale is not convincing. After all, they could have a beeper if someone needed them that badly, and then they could call at the next available moment ... from the pay phones, just like we have to do.

Update: For a good reason why the Court should allow all attorneys - or none at all - to use and have their cellphones inside the courthouse (or at the very least to have) see my post at Macondo Law: There's a Crook at the Federal Court's Security Checkpoint. To this day the theft remains unsolved.
 

August 20, 2004

Cell phones at the US District Court

PRACDL is in the process of requesting approval of the use of cell phones by counsel in the courthouse lobby for emergencies and to simply contact one's office an take care of other client-attorney matters. We strongly feel that if prosecutors and federal public defenders can have such privilege, panel and non-panel defense counsel should be entitled to equal treatment. We will be updating this notice.

Since 1991


  • NACDL

PRACDL Group Listserv